{"id":5140,"date":"2017-08-21T17:00:51","date_gmt":"2017-08-21T16:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/?p=5140"},"modified":"2017-08-21T00:15:12","modified_gmt":"2017-08-20T23:15:12","slug":"the-amazing-a-10-warthog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/the-amazing-a-10-warthog\/","title":{"rendered":"The amazing A-10 Warthog<\/b>!"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"Roll <\/a>
The first A-10 has been made ready for shipping to Edwards AFB from Long Island (photo: Fairchild Republic archives via Cradle of Aviation). <\/div> <\/div>
\"Second <\/a>
The second A-10 prototype aircraft is being assembled at the company\u2019s plant in early 1972 (photo: Fairchild Republic archives via Cradle of Aviation). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Wing <\/a>
Workers load the first A-10 wings into the C-124 (photo: Fairchild Republic archives via Cradle of Aviation). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"First <\/a>
At the Long Island plant, the first A-10 had engine ground testing performed in late 1971 (photo: Fairchild Republic archives via Cradle of Aviation). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Second <\/a>
The serial number for the second prototype was 71-1370 and would also be disassembled and shipped to Edwards AFB (photo: Fairchild Republic archives via Cradle of Aviation). <\/div> <\/div>
\"Shipment <\/a>
The fuselage section of the first A-10, serial number 71-1369 is loaded into a C-124 Globemaster in early 1972 for delivery to Edwards AFB for flyoff competition with the Northrop A-9 (photo: Fairchild Republic archives via Cradle of Aviation). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The United States Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II (more often known as the \u201cWarthog\u201d) is the most unique aircraft in US service. The aircraft has been in service since 1974 and will continue to serve the US Air Force well into the 2020s. The aircraft if the only military aircraft that is dedicated strictly to the role of close air support (CAS) and it has several unusual features that help it meet that role.<\/p>\n

The experiences of the Vietnam War pointed out the need for aircraft that was dedicated to the CAS mission. Although aircraft like the A-1 Skyraider, the F-4 Phantom and the A-7D Corsair were used in this role, they were not originally designed for this purpose. Thus in March of 1967, the US Air Force issued a request for proposal (RFP) to 21 companies for design studies involving a low-cost attack aircraft designated as the A-X proposal. A final RFP was issued in May of 1970 with specific requirements as well as having a head-on flying competition that would be conducted for the first time in several years between prototypes build by the two finalists chosen by the Air Force.<\/p>\n

In August of 1970, six companies submitted formal proposals for the A-X development contract. The Fairchild Republic Company was one of the six companies and it was in the most precarious situation. The Fairchild Republic Company finished production of the F-105 Thunderchief in 1964, a workhorse during the Vietnam War and the company had no major aircraft programs in house.<\/p>\n

\n
\"Production <\/a>
The final production line was in a large hanger in Hagerstown. Aircraft are fully assembled with the engines and gun installed. The next step is for paint and then flight testing (photo: Fairchild Republic Archives via Cradle of Aviation). <\/div> <\/div>
\"Wing <\/a>
The wing assembly for each A-10 production aircraft was built at the Farmingdale, Long Island plant (photo: Ken Neubeck). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Fuselage <\/a>
This fuselage section has been packaged and ready for trucking to the Hagerstown plant in Maryland (photo: Ken Neubeck). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Final <\/a>
In the final assembly area in Farmingdale, the wing assembly would be paired with the fuselage for that aircraft (photo: Fairchild Republic Archives via Cradle of Aviation). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Production <\/a>
Plant areas were assigned to building certain A-10 sections. The northeast area had the fuselage section (photo: Ken Neubeck). <\/div> <\/div>
\"Production <\/a>
The maximum production rate that was achieved on the A-10 program was 13 aircraft a month (photo: Fairchild Republic Archives via Cradle of Aviation). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n

In December of 1970, Fairchild Republic and the Northrop Company were chosen as the two finalists by the Air Force with each company building two prototype aircraft each that would participate in a competitive flyoff to win the A-X contract. Fairchild took the approach that their aircraft (designated the A-10) was more representative of a production aircraft whereas Northrop\u2019s approach (the A-9) was that of a conventional prototype that would have required several changes before coming into production.<\/p>\n

The A-9 was conventional in appearance with shoulder-mounted wings and engines located neatly in the fuselage under the wing, along with a single vertical tail fin. The A-10 was more radical in appearance as it had the two engines mounted high on the rear portion of the fuselage, along with the use of a dual cantilever tail section. The reason for the high engine location by Fairchild was to increase survivability of the engines by keeping away from runway debris and ground fire, as well as a shield against ground infrared radar. The unique tail section design provided stability as well as shielding the engine exhaust from ground infrared radar.<\/p>\n

\n
\"Rear <\/a>
From the rear of the A-10 aircraft, two noticeable features specific to the A-10 can be seen: the height of both engines above the fuselage and the wide separation that exists between the two vertical stabilizers of the tail section (photo: Ken Neubeck). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Cannon\" <\/a>
The 30mm Cannon is the most distinctive feature on the nose of the A-10 (photo: Ken Neubeck). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Bathtub\" <\/a>
The pilot and cockpit equipment are protected from ground fire by a 1-inch thick titanium bathtub (photo: Fairchild Republic archives via Cradle of Aviation). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Engine <\/a>
The location of the engine nacelles high on the fuselage gives the engines less vulnerability to ground fire and debris from unimproved runaways (photo: Ken Neubeck). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Nose <\/a>
Because of the size of the 30mm cannon, the nose landing gear is off center (photo: Ken Neubeck). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The A-10 wings are long and perpendicular to the fuselage in order to give the maximum amount of lift possible to the aircraft during takeoffs from short runways. Survival features for the A-10 aircraft included the use of a one-inch thick titanium \u201cbathtub\u201d that would enclose the cockpit, providing protection for the pilot against ground fire as well as protection for some of the critical flight control cables that were located in the cockpit area. Other survival features included the lining of the fuel cells in the wings with ballistic foam pieces that would soak fuel and not allow a fire to break out if the cells received a direct hit from enemy ground fire. The primary flight controls had triple redundancy with a dual redundant hydraulic system that was backed by a cable system that could be used in the manual reversion mode if hydraulic power was lost (This particular feature would be demonstrated vividly years later during war action).<\/p>\n

The A-10 was essentially a plane that was built around a gun. The gun assembly consisted of seven long barrels and was almost twenty feet long along which attached to a very large ammo drum that had to be fitted inside the fuselage. Fairchild Republic engineers took a novel approach with regards to the nose landing gear of the aircraft by locating it off-center of the middle of the fuselage in order to accommodate the long barrels of the gun and to allow the landing gear to fit when retracted. The gun could fire at a slow or high rate of speed, with the maximum rate of speed being 4000 rounds per minute with the ammo drum holding 1350 rounds.<\/p>\n

In January of 1973, Fairchild Republic was announced as the winner of the flyoff competition. A major reason for picking the A-10 was that the A-10 prototype was made to be much more representative of a production aircraft by Fairchild Republic and there would be less transitional difficulties in starting the production line. However, there were some political hurdles that had to be resolved first as the congressional delegation from Texas was pushing for the older A-7D Corsair II aircraft built by Vought in Texas to perform the CAS mission. This resulted in a subsequent flyoff between the A-10 and the A7 in April of 1974 and it was determined that the A-10 was the better aircraft for meeting the CAS mission, particularly in the areas of target spotting in less than ideal conditions as well as having better survivability features.<\/p>\n

\n
\"Chopper <\/a>
A-10 serial Number 77-0205, \u201cChopper Popper\u201d from the 906th TFG, has Iraqi flag located on its left side marking an air-to-air kill of Iraqi helicopter (photo: Anthony Abbott). <\/div> <\/div>
\"Wing <\/a>
One of the most publicized events involving the A-10 during Desert Storm was this A-10 (78-0664) flown by Captain Paul Johnson that was hit by a SAM missile. Despite wing and engine damage, the A-10 flew back to base (photo: USAF). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Wing <\/a>
The damaged wing from A-10 serial number 78-0664 shows the torn open wing fuel cell section (photo: Fred Schlenker III). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"30 <\/a>
This destroyed Iraqi T-55 tank bears the tell-tale sign of an A-10 attack with a hole in the turret that was most likely made from a 30mm shell (photo: US Department of Defense). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Missile <\/a>
This A-10 Warthog was flown by the 23rd TFW wing commander and it was able to return back to base, despite severe damage to the tail section from a missile (photo: USAF). <\/div> <\/div>
\"Wing <\/a>
Significant damage was incurred on the leading edge of the right wing and right landing gear of Captain Johnson\u2019s A-10 (photo: USAF). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The A-10 began production in 1975 with initial bases set up throughout the US and one in Europe in Bentwaters of the United Kingdom. The presence of the A-10 in Europe would be a counterbalance against the massive amount of tanks in the Warsaw Pact led by the Soviet Union. Pilots would nickname the aircraft the Warthog, due to its odd appearance and a few years later, it was officially designated as the Thunderbolt II, in honor of the original P-47 Thunderbolt built by Republic during World War II.<\/p>\n

A total of 713 aircraft were built with the last one delivered to the US Air Force in 1984. However, changes in the political climate in Europe saw the end of the Iron Curtain in 1988 and the need for the A-10 appeared to be diminished. The aircraft was destined to be scrapped by the Air Force when in 2001, the A-10 was sent over to the Middle East as part of Operation Desert Storm to liberate Kuwait from Iraq. During the 43-day war, the A-10 conducted hundreds of missions that included downed-pilot rescue, SCUD missile hunting and most important of all, the destruction of almost 1000 Iraqi tanks.<\/p>\n

\n
\"Fuel <\/a>
In addition to the fuel system control panel, the left wing fuel tank held a credit card in case the pilot landed at an airport were that popular payment method would be the only way to acquire fuel for his aircraft (photo: Carlos Ay). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Iraqi <\/a>
Five A-10s from the 442nd Fighter Wing from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri are being prepped for an upcoming mission during Operation Iraqi Freedom in April of 2003 (photo: USAF\/Captain Ken Hill). <\/div> <\/div>
\"Deployment <\/a>
The A-10 started showing up in force in 2002 in Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. Here is an AFRES A-10 aircraft from the 926th FW Cajuns from the Naval Air Station (NAS) at New Orleans is on the flight line at Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan (photo: USAF\/TSGT Melissa Sanscrainte). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Battle <\/a>
Repair technician is applying a metal patch to repair a bullet hole on A-10 (photo: USAF). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Warthog <\/a>
Women were active during Desert Storm as seen by this female ground crew member applying the safety to the AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles (photo: USAF). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>
\"Alfa <\/a>
After loosing the competition to Fairchild Republic’s A-10, the prototype Northrop A-9 found a resting place at the March AFB museum in Riverside (California), where this image was taken in February 2000 (photo: Fernando Puppy Guzm\u00e1n). <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n

With this new lease on life, the A-10 would successfully support various US operations overseas over the next 20 years in Bosnia, Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq (again) and Libya. While the A-10 has been accruing flying hours, efforts have been taken to upgrade its wings and avionics to extend its service life.<\/p>\n

In recent years, there have been many debates in US Congress about keeping the A-10 in service, primarily because of budget concerns. However, with many ground personnel testifying the effectiveness of the aircraft, the retirement of the A-10 has been put off indefinitely. Currently, there are approximately 283 A-10 are still in service.<\/p>\n

\n

About the author<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Ken Neubeck<\/strong> is an aerospace reliability engineer and a former employee of the Fairchild Republic Company that worked on the A-10 program, who has written several aviation books and articles, including books on the A-10 Warthog.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The United States Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II (more often known as the \u201cWarthog\u201d) is the most unique aircraft in US service. The aircraft has been in service since 1974 and will continue to serve the US Air Force well into the 2020s. The aircraft if the only military aircraft that is dedicated strictly to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":5186,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[4],"tags":[50,36],"class_list":["post-5140","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-defence","tag-a-10-warthog","tag-aeromilitaria-usa"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/3017\/08\/Page-5-2.jpg?fit=1600%2C1069&ssl=1","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1JKRl-1kU","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":9600,"url":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/connecticut-aviation-museums-tour\/","url_meta":{"origin":5140,"position":0},"title":"Aviation museums curate Sikorsky, Kaman, P&W, Hamilton Standard, Curtiss and Vought legacy in Connecticut","author":"Carlos Ay","date":"Thursday 1 February 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A fortuitous pre-winter holiday visit to the United States in early December 2023 provided a unique opportunity to visit and inspect the four aviation-related museums in the State of Connecticut... come discover the treasures preserved in these institutions.","rel":"","context":"In "Commercial air transport"","block_context":{"text":"Commercial air transport","link":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/category\/transport\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Atlantic Clipper","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/3024\/01\/3-2023-12-09-14-53-48-IMG_1014_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/3024\/01\/3-2023-12-09-14-53-48-IMG_1014_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/3024\/01\/3-2023-12-09-14-53-48-IMG_1014_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/3024\/01\/3-2023-12-09-14-53-48-IMG_1014_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6363,"url":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/from-la-matanza-to-ohio-5-5-at-the-usaf-museum\/","url_meta":{"origin":5140,"position":1},"title":"From La Matanza to Ohio (5\/5): At the USAF Museum","author":"Alejandro Vidal","date":"Thursday 17 February 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"This section is referred to the Martin\u00b4s total restoration process between 1973 and 1976, ending with the installment of the aircraft in the USAF Museum, where it is exhibited until today, painted in the Army Air Corps paint scheme of the 30s \u2013 in contradiction of the donation law.","rel":"","context":"In "Wrecks & relics"","block_context":{"text":"Wrecks & relics","link":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/category\/relics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/05e-268-Ed-Prescott_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C819&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/05e-268-Ed-Prescott_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C819&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/05e-268-Ed-Prescott_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C819&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/05e-268-Ed-Prescott_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C819&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":5201,"url":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/gacetas-2018-calendar-pay-tribute-to-argentine-airmen-fighting-the-malvinas-war\/","url_meta":{"origin":5140,"position":2},"title":"Gaceta’s 2018 calendar pays tribute to Argentine airmen fighting the Malvinas War","author":"Carlos Ay","date":"Monday 9 October 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Building upon the experience of our first \"hard copy\" product (see\u00a02016 Calendar\/FIDAE Warriors),\u00a0Gaceta Aeron\u00e1utica is releasing a new calendar for 2018. This time, we pay tribute to Argentine airmen fighting the Malvinas War with a\u00a012-months calendar illustrated with photos showing civil and military aircraft in special markings earned for their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Media & publications"","block_context":{"text":"Media & publications","link":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/category\/media\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/00-COVER-650px.jpg?fit=650%2C507&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/00-COVER-650px.jpg?fit=650%2C507&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/00-COVER-650px.jpg?fit=650%2C507&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4062,"url":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/anatolian-eagle-20132-at-konya-afb-turkey\/","url_meta":{"origin":5140,"position":3},"title":"Anatolian Eagle 2013\/2 at Konya AFB Turkey","author":"Robert Nispeling - Karo Aviation","date":"Friday 6 June 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"At the end of 20th century it became clear that air forces would continue to play a major role in deterrence and in the determination of the outcome of future wars. Experiences gained in allied operations in Iraq, the Balkan conflict of the nineties, Afghanistan and more recently Libya has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Defence & security"","block_context":{"text":"Defence & security","link":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/category\/defence\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/konya0.jpg?fit=650%2C434&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/konya0.jpg?fit=650%2C434&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/konya0.jpg?fit=650%2C434&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":10407,"url":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/data-mining-for-argentine-viper-fleet-identities\/","url_meta":{"origin":5140,"position":4},"title":"Data mining for Argentine Viper identities…","author":"Carlos Ay","date":"Monday 24 February 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Minister of Defense, Luis Petri, visit to Tandil air base for the \"F-16 Weapons System Reception Ceremony\" acquired last year for the Argentine Air Force (FAA) provides an ideal time frame for our first complete forecast of the the 24 Royal Danish Air Force (RDAF) airframes that will start\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Defence & security"","block_context":{"text":"Defence & security","link":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/category\/defence\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Readying for Have Glass V?","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/3025\/02\/2025-02-13-F-16BM-Aalborg_Kurt-Saxkjaer-Milfly_Collection_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/3025\/02\/2025-02-13-F-16BM-Aalborg_Kurt-Saxkjaer-Milfly_Collection_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/3025\/02\/2025-02-13-F-16BM-Aalborg_Kurt-Saxkjaer-Milfly_Collection_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/3025\/02\/2025-02-13-F-16BM-Aalborg_Kurt-Saxkjaer-Milfly_Collection_edited.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203,"url":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/argentine-mirage-replacement-still-in-planning-as-pilots-airframes-soldier-on\/","url_meta":{"origin":5140,"position":5},"title":"Argentine Mirage replacement still in planning as pilots, airframes soldier on","author":"Carlos Ay","date":"Monday 5 April 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Argentina\u2019s Air Force has spent decades planning to replace its dwindling inventory of Delta-fighters. The most recent solo flight ceremony was a good opportunity to check official sources as to the present status of this \u201cnever ending story\u201d kind of project.","rel":"","context":"In "Defence & security"","block_context":{"text":"Defence & security","link":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/category\/defence\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/avc_00164588.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/avc_00164588.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/avc_00164588.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/avc_00164588.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5140"}],"version-history":[{"count":26,"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5140\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5199,"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5140\/revisions\/5199"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5186"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gacetaeronautica.com\/gaceta\/wp-102\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}